<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hdr on PIXLS.US</title>
    <link>https://staging.pixls.us/tags/hdr/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hdr on PIXLS.US</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:12:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://staging.pixls.us/tags/hdr/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Aligning Images with Hugin</title>
      <link>https://staging.pixls.us/articles/aligning-images-with-hugin/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:12:04 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>https://staging.pixls.us/articles/aligning-images-with-hugin/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://hugin.sourceforge.net/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;Hugin&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;&#xA; is an excellent tool for for aligning and stitching images. In this article, we&amp;rsquo;ll focus on aligning a stack of images. Aligning a stack of images can be useful for achieving several results, such as:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;bracketed exposures to make an HDR or fused exposure (using enfuse/enblend), or manually blending the images together in an image editor&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;photographs taken at different focal distances to extend the depth of field, which can be very useful when taking macros&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;photographs taken over a period of time to make a time-lapse movie&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For the example images included with this tutorial, the &lt;em&gt;focal length&lt;/em&gt; is &lt;strong&gt;12mm&lt;/strong&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;focal length multiplier&lt;/em&gt; is &lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;. A big thank you to &lt;a href=&#34;https://discuss.pixls.us/users/isaac/activity&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;@isaac&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;&#xA; for providing these images.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HDR Photography with Free Software (LuminanceHDR)</title>
      <link>https://staging.pixls.us/articles/hdr-photography-with-free-software-luminancehdr/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:57:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://staging.pixls.us/articles/hdr-photography-with-free-software-luminancehdr/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have a mostly love/hate relationship with HDR images (well, tonemapping HDR more than the HDR themselves).&#xA;I think the problem is that it&amp;rsquo;s very easy to create really bad HDR images that the photographer &lt;em&gt;thinks look really good&lt;/em&gt;.&#xA;I know because I&amp;rsquo;ve been there:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;figure&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;226464161_2a792c925d_z.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;Hayleys - Mobile, AL&#34; height=&#34;369&#34; width=&#34;640&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;figcaption&gt;Don&#39;t judge me, it was a weird time in my life...&lt;/figcaption&gt;&#xA;&lt;/figure&gt; &#xA;&lt;p&gt;The best term I&amp;rsquo;ve heard used to describe over-processed images created from an HDR is &lt;i&gt;&amp;ldquo;clown vomit&amp;rdquo; &lt;/i&gt;(which would also be a great name for a band, by the way).&#xA;They are easily spotted with some tell-tale signs such as the halos at high-contrast edges, the unrealistically hyper-saturated colors that make your eyes bleed, and a general affront to good taste.&#xA;In fact, while I&amp;rsquo;m putting up embarrassing images that I&amp;rsquo;ve done in the past, here&amp;rsquo;s one that scores on all the points for a crappy image from an HDR:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
